Ticket #902 (closed Enhancement: fixed)
Add Event type to standard distro
Reported by: | jri | Owned by: | jri |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Major | Milestone: | Release 4.8 |
Component: | DeepaMehta Standard Distribution | Version: | 4.7 |
Keywords: | Cc: | dgf, Malte, JuergeN | |
Complexity: | 5 | Area: | |
Module: |
Description
The DM Standard Distribution should come with an Event type as the basis for calendaring applications.
Besides From and To date/time an Event should have a Name, a Description, a Location, Organizers (many), and Participants (many). As Location everything that has an Address should be applicable. Organizers/Participants? should be Persons or Institutions.
This could be realized in a separate dm4-events module.
Change History
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by jri
In 7cd661c0e2ca8a53e4a22c933a308dcabb70cfe8:
"Event" model: add Participant (#902).
A "Participant" association represent that a Person/Institution? is participating (that is contributing) to an event.
"Participant" is not explicitley defined as a Event child. Participant associations are created manually be the user.
See #902.
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by Jörg Richter <jri@…>
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by JuergeN
I have just playes a little with events. Here are my observations:
- Even though I had argued to name the months by numbers, I must say that identifying them by name would make it a lot easier and safer to read. Especially because of the different German and anglo-american date formats. I would suggest to use abbreviations (Jan., Feb., Mar., etc.)
- I would enhance the aggregation definition between Event and Address with a custom assoc definition called 'Location' (or likewise). One of the reasons for this is also to solve the missing input field labels in the detail panel. IMO it is really not a good UI design that we offer input fields without any descriptor (eg. 'From' and 'To' date field). In my understanding this descriptor should come from the custom assoc. definitions. I would be very happy, if we could give this a try.
- Changing the input fields for date and time into a one-liner would be a nice improvement.
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by jri
Thanks for feedback!
These are good points.
I'll will find a solution :-)
comment:13 Changed 9 years ago by Jörg Richter <jri@…>
comment:14 Changed 9 years ago by Jörg Richter <jri@…>
comment:15 Changed 9 years ago by Jörg Richter <jri@…>
comment:16 Changed 9 years ago by Jörg Richter <jri@…>
comment:17 Changed 9 years ago by jri
- Status changed from accepted to closed
- Resolution set to fixed
comment:18 Changed 9 years ago by jri
- Status changed from closed to reopened
- Resolution fixed deleted
For the user the "From" and "To" datetime fields are not distinguishable. They should have labels.
comment:19 Changed 9 years ago by Jörg Richter <jri@…>
comment:20 Changed 9 years ago by jri
- Status changed from reopened to closed
- Resolution set to fixed